I have a bit of an issue that has come up in the past month and seeking some advice about how to address it with the team leader and HR.
I have been working as a graduate in an engineering consultancy firm for almost 16 months, and I wasn't employed under their formal graduate program. This graduate program has employees rotating throughout the business for 2 - 3 years depending on their discipline. I have started on $74 k p.a. not including super and it was same starting rate as the engineering graduates. I have had C.P.I. increases at the start of the financial year of 2024/25 in line with the Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (EBA) like everyone else in the company. However, as a particular side note my team specifically doesn't get graduates in the program rotating in our team.
My team leader made a promise that I would go up another band this coming financial year back in March and then last month reneged on it as he told me asked a senior colleague about my level of particular equipment. This metric for going up into another band was not presented to me whatsoever and it was a completely arbitrary reason. I have been quite disheartened by this and I by the end of 2025 I would have been almost 2 years with the company without a salary increase beyond the C.P.I. increase.
A role for the graduate program in our team was advertised this year and they have been interviewing prospective candidates to start in February 2026. Now the issue I have is that I have recently found out that employees on the graduate program get additional salary increases of around 6% at the end of the first year and 8% at the end of the second year on the program. This is on top of the general C.P.I increases. I have chatted with a colleague in another team who was in the graduate program who told me that all they need to do to get these increases is achieve their yearly goals and some supervisors make them easy so they can get the salary increases. This means that the future graduate on my team will get automatic pay increases, and I won't just because I am not on a graduate program despite doing the same work in the team as this future colleague.
Could anyone give any advice about how I go about this? This has been bothering me for quite a while and my team leader is not someone who likes to be challenged about things at all from experience.
Response
I completely understand your frustration - this situation is both legally problematic and professionally unfair. You're absolutely right to feel disheartened, and you have strong grounds to challenge this discriminatory treatment. Let me look up the most relevant information about your rights in this situation.
You're facing a frustrating situation that combines both workplace discrimination concerns and strategic career advancement challenges. Let me break down your legal position and practical options.
Legal Protections Under Australian Law
. Your situation potentially involves discriminatory treatment based on when you started and your employment pathway rather than your actual performance or capabilities.
.
The key legal question is whether you're performing work of equal or comparable value to the graduate program participants while receiving systematically different remuneration due to an arbitrary classification system rather than merit-based factors.
Strategic Approach to Address This Issue
1. Document Everything Immediately
Record the March promise from your team leader about the band increase
Document the arbitrary equipment knowledge reason given for reneging
Keep records of your work outputs, achievements, and responsibilities
Note specific examples where your work equals or exceeds what graduate program participants do
Save any communications about performance expectations or achievements
2. Research Your Position Thoroughly
Obtain a copy of your Enterprise Bargaining Agreement and review the salary band progression criteria
Request clarity on what specific metrics determine band increases (this should be transparent)
Document the graduate program salary increase structure (6% and 8% increases)
Compare your job duties with those of graduate program participants
3. Build Your Business Case
Frame this as equal pay for equal work rather than challenging your team leader's authority:
"I'm seeking clarity on how our remuneration system ensures equal pay for equal work"
"I want to understand the pathway for career progression outside the formal graduate program"
"I'm concerned about potential pay equity issues given I'm performing comparable work to graduate program participants"
4. Strategic Communication Approach
Given your team leader's resistance to being challenged, approach this diplomatically:
With HR First: Schedule a meeting to discuss "career progression pathways and pay equity" rather than framing it as a complaint about your team leader.
Key Points to Raise:
You're performing equivalent work to graduate program participants
The salary progression system appears to create unequal remuneration for equal work
You're seeking transparent criteria for advancement outside the graduate program
You want to ensure the company's practices align with fair work principles
With Your Team Leader: After speaking with HR, approach as seeking mentorship:
"I'd like to understand the specific competencies needed for advancement"
"Can we establish clear, measurable goals for the next review period?"
"I want to ensure I'm developing the right skills for career progression"
Escalation Options
If internal discussions don't resolve this:
Fair Work Commission Application
. .
Union Support
If your workplace has union representation, they can provide strategic advice and potentially support an equal remuneration application on your behalf.
Fair Work Ombudsman
They can investigate potential discrimination and provide guidance on whether your situation constitutes adverse action based on arbitrary classification rather than merit.
Timeline Strategy
Immediate (Next 2 weeks):
Document everything thoroughly
Schedule HR meeting about "career progression pathways"
Review your EBA for advancement criteria
Short-term (Next month):
Follow up HR meeting with written summary
Request written criteria for band advancement
Have structured conversation with team leader about development goals
Medium-term (2-3 months):
If no progress, consider formal complaint or Fair Work Commission application
Legal Context
. This gives you strong leverage in discussions.
Your situation appears to involve systematic pay inequality based on employment pathway rather than work value or performance. This is exactly the type of issue Australian employment law is designed to address. Approach this strategically, document everything, and don't let your team leader's communication style prevent you from advocating for fair treatment.
The upcoming graduate hire actually strengthens your position - it will create a direct comparison showing unequal pay for equal work within the same team. Use this timing to your advantage in discussions with HR and management.